This procedure sets out how to check on workers who are on their own where help is not readily available, including what happens when a check-in is missed. Alberta (OHS Code, Part 28, ss. 393–394) requires an effective communication system for a worker working alone, and British Columbia (OHSR, ss. 4.20.1–4.23) requires a written procedure for checking worker well-being. Saskatchewan (OHS Regulations, 2020, s. 3-24) and Manitoba (M.R. 217/2006, Part 9) also regulate working alone. Ontario has no general working-alone regulation.
The PDF is free to read and print, no sign-up needed. If you want a copy you can edit with your company name, sites and contacts, we will email you the Word file. The full library is at Free HSE Resources.
We send occasional Canadian OHS updates. Unsubscribe any time.
A worker is working alone when they are on their own at a work location and assistance is not readily available in the event of injury, ill health or emergency. This procedure applies to:
Common examples: after-hours or single-staff shifts, remote or field work, mobile service and delivery, night retail or reception, driving between sites, and work in areas with no cellular coverage.
Requirements differ by province. Confirm the current wording, including any task-specific rules, and record the provisions that apply to this operation:
| Jurisdiction | Provision | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Alberta | OHS Code, Part 28, ss. 393–394 | Application; an effective communication system for any worker working alone. |
| British Columbia | OHSR, ss. 4.20.1–4.23 | Written procedure for checking worker well-being (4.21), training (4.22), late-night retail (4.22.1), annual review (4.23). |
| Saskatchewan | OHS Regulations, 2020, s. 3-24 | Working alone or at an isolated place of employment. |
| Manitoba | M.R. 217/2006, Part 9, ss. 9.1–9.3 | Application, risk identification and safe work procedures. |
| Ontario | OHSA, s. 25(2)(h) | No general working-alone regulation; the employer’s general duty to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances applies. Construction Projects, O. Reg. 213/91, ss. 225 and 246, require another worker above ground when work is done in a trench or in a shaft, tunnel, caisson or cofferdam. |
| Other jurisdiction |
Complete one row per working-alone situation. The assessment drives the check-in interval — higher risk means shorter intervals.
| Task / situation | Hazards present | Consequence if injured alone | Risk (L/M/H) | Controls | Check-in interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requirement | What good looks like | Y / N / N-A | Evidence or gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary method selected | Cell phone, satellite messenger, two-way radio, or monitored lone-worker device. | ||
| Coverage verified on site | Tested at the actual work location, not assumed from a coverage map. | ||
| Backup method available | A second method for when the primary fails or has no coverage. | ||
| Device charged and carried | On the person, not in the vehicle. | ||
| Panic or man-down function | Where the risk assessment calls for it, and tested. | ||
| Worker trained on the system | Including what to do if they cannot reach the contact. |
Primary method: Backup:
Known no-coverage areas and the alternative used there:
Designated contact: Phone:
Backup contact: Phone:
Standard check-in interval: Final check-in at end of shift by:
Escalation when a check-in is missed — complete every row with a real name and a real elapsed time:
| Step | Elapsed time | Action | Who does it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attempt contact on primary method | ||
| 2 | Attempt backup method and any known site number | ||
| 3 | Contact supervisor and confirm last known location | ||
| 4 | Dispatch a person to the location | ||
| 5 | Contact emergency services with location and details |
| Requirement | What good looks like | Y / N / N-A | Evidence or gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workers trained on this procedure | With dated records. | ||
| Designated contacts trained | Including the escalation ladder and how to reach emergency services with location detail. | ||
| System tested | Escalation tested periodically as a drill, not first used in a real event. | ||
| Procedure reviewed | At least annually and after any incident, near miss, or change in the work. | ||
| Worker consultation | JHSC or representative involved in the assessment and review. |
| Worker | Location / itinerary | Start | Interval | Expected finish | Contact method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time due | Worker | Time received | By whom | Location update | Escalated? (Y/N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Worker | Step reached | Action taken | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Our consultants (CRSP Certified · COR & ISO 45001 Lead Auditors) can adapt this to your workplace or review your safety program with you.
This resource is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm every requirement against the current regulation in your jurisdiction before relying on it.